But I digress. Over the past several years, our bird feeders have evolved. Early on, we spent all of our lottery winnings ($3) on commercial bird feeders. Secondary to doing good deeds with feeds, we started snapping pictures of the little creatures using the new world of digital cameras. We liked open feeders, but this is New Hampshire. We get snow, mostly during the winter.
(See Picture 1) So, in order to get better lighting for picture taking, I built an open bird feeder with a feeder chute and a ¼ inch Plexiglas roof. It was then mounted it on a PVC pole with a large cutting board and a PVC flange. The feeder was about 30 ft from our window and was large enough for a wild turkey (not the kind that comes in a bottle). It was great for the birds, but the problem with the photos is something called “depth of field.” The other problem, which I will discuss my solution later, is that the farther one gets from the camera lens, the softer the details of the small bird feathers. I don’t want to sell my house to buy the lens that would fix that problem. Plus, if I wanted to take that lens anywhere, and mounted it on a tripod in the back of my pickup, the border guards between New Hampshire and Maine might suspect it was a giant weapon of some kind.
(See Picture 2) I like natural. (Not referring to how often I take a shower) Not that the birds care, but some professional photographer from Manhattan might. One day, one of them was talking to lowly me in a gallery in Portsmouth. He obviously had no intention of buying, but commented that he found a pixel on the 6 ft x 8 ft photograph on the corner wall. After he left, I followed him as he went around the corner and got into his rusted 1973 Pinto he had parked on the back street. You just can’t please everyone!
Where was I? Anyway, to give a little natural flavor, I screwed a section of birch tree branch to the front of the bird feeder and attached a small wooden bowl to it. A section of the branch shows in the photo (#2) by Nancy (thru a window glass) of the woodpecker and the cardinal. The narrow branch and bowl helped, but we still got a little softening due to the distance. We often find we get sharper pictures with less expensive zoom cameras, even at closer distances. But we also get more noise (aka graininess in films) Of course, I probably have no idea of how to use my cameras.
(See Picture 3) Simultaneously, we had bird feeders closer to the house. One was an umbrella feeder that the cardinals loved, but the pictures were unusable, as the birds continued to artistically express themselves on the bottom and edges of the feeder. We are planning to use small lighthouses, picnic tables, and various toys to give a variety of pictures for (our) entertainment. Most recently, continuing the natural scene, I used a weathered stick on a pole with a small branch attached and clicked a few more pictures. The small vertical branch seems to help the less expensive cameras find some better reference for faster focus. Picture 3 was taken with an SLR to push up the ISO (like film speed) in order to achieve a faster shutter speed (like shutter speed).
(See Picture 4) Maybe in the future, we will become more natural by adding a feeder of sorts to the peach tree where the doves like to rest.
Until then, keep your lens clean.
Lin Wickett
No comments:
Post a Comment